Effect of COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 on expression of PGE<sub>2</sub>receptor subtypes in M-1 mouse CCD cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our present study has investigated the effect of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibition on prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) receptor expression in M-1 cortical collecting duct cells and measured their response to PGE2. Using a semiquantitative titration analysis method, we show that following the addition of the COX-2-specific inhibitor NS-398, E-prostanoid receptor subtype (EP3 and EP4) mRNA expression was found to increase threefold each vs. the vehicle-treated control. We also observed that EP1 but not EP2 is expressed in M-1 cells and EP2 levels are not induced by NS-398. To determine the status of the PGE2 response on exposure to NS-398, we measured cAMP levels in cells after stimulation with varying concentrations of PGE2, then pretreated the cells with 10 microM NS-398 before PGE2 exposure and found a significant rise in the stimulatory effect of PGE2 on cAMP production. Finally, Western blot analysis of the levels of the EP4 receptor protein in control vs. NS-398-treated cells revealed an induction in protein levels in these cells, correlating with the induction in EP4 mRNA. We conclude that NS-398 upregulates the expression of EP3 and EP4 mRNA in M-1 cells. Also, EP4 protein levels are increased, resulting in an increased stimulation of cAMP production by PGE2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".