STUDY ON THE APPLICABILITY OF GREEN SPACE RATIO AS THE EVALUATION INDEX OF GREEN QUALITY FOR TRADITIONAL COURTYARD AREA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Green space ratio has been widely used as the evaluation index of green quality for an area in city planning and construction. Although this evaluation index is suitable for most modern construction projects, it is very difficult for most projects located in traditional courtyard area to meet the established standard. This paper analyzes the reasons, compares a traditional courtyard area with a modern residential quarter on their carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration values of green space, and concludes that green space ratio is not a good measurement for green space of courtyard area, and that the number of trees, integrated green coverage rate, green plot ratio, and CO2 sequestration may be more suitable to evaluate green quality in the courtyard area. Meanwhile, a method for calculating CO2 sequestration and making a more feasible evaluation index for green space is also presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it