Extracorpereal shock wave therapy for scapulohumeral periarthritis:a single blind study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To evaluate clinical outcomes of extracorpereal shock wave therapy(ESWT) to scapulohumeral periarthritis in a single blind study.Method:Forty-seven patients with chronic,symptomatic scapulohumeral periarthritis were tested.A single blind controlled study was performed with 26 cases undergone ESWT(ESWT group) and 21 treated by joint mobilization combined with shortwave therapy(control group).Pain and functional assessment were carried out according to the Short Form McGill Pain Questionaire(SF-MPQ) and range of motion(ROM).SF-MPQ was assessed pre-and post-treatment,and at the 1st week,4th week and 8th week after the course of treatment and ROM was assessed pre-and post-treatment merely.Result:Patients of both groups got obvious relief in shoulder pain and great improvement of ROM,but compared with control group,there was no significant difference in SF-MPQ scores and promotion of ROM in ESWT group.Conclusion:As a good tolerant,safe,and time saving therapy,ESWT can be utilized as an alternative treatment for scapulohumeral periarthritis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".