MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2373131866

The enrichment characteristics and undiscovered resources evaluation of the conventional oil and gas in North America

2014· article· en· W2373131866 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fen Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueDixue qianyuan · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCenozoicPaleozoicPaleontologyCratonSource rockStructural basinDevonianTectonicsEarth scienceGeochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Paleozoic and Cenozoic fold belt were collaged around the periphery of the Canadian shield and formed the North American continent which experienced the Ordovician oceanic crust expansion,SilurianTriassic crust closure,Meso-Cenozoic plate collision and the disintegration of the ancient land.During these four evolutionary stages,three kinds of plate boundary,five tectonic units and seven types of basin were formed.The study of the petroleum geological characteristics shows the Paleozoic marine carbonate and Cenozoic clastic sediments in North America.There are multiple sets of source rock and reservoir which formed three oil and gas enrichment zones including stable craton,Cenozoic fold belt and passive continental margin.This research evaluates the 30plays of 9major basins using the discovery process method and the results reveal the geological resources are 308BBO and the undiscovered resources are 156BBO;The whole undiscovered resources of the North America are 208BBO according to the USGS(2000)evaluation results.Abundant undiscovered resources are found in the Tertiary play in the gulf of Mexico deep-water basin,Devonian play in Alberta basin,Mississippi-Jurassic play in Alaska and Jurassic-Cretaceous play and were the exploration direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDixue qianyuanSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207