Further detailed analysis about shock wave reflection outside Laval nozzle in different working states
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When ratio of environmental pressure to total pressure increases from design state to third limit condition(normal shock at the outlet of nozzle),there are different shock wave phenomena outside the Laval nozzle.According to extant theory about shock wave reflection,the working range between design condition and the third limit condition was subdivided into several sections: strong oblique shock wave condition,Mach reflection condition,regular reflection and dual solution domain.Three critical ratios of environmental pressure to total pressure were proposed and determined to replace flow-deviation angle for estimating different Laval nozzle working statuses.Varying tendency of these critical ratios of Laval nozzle in various aspect ratios were also given with a figure.The pressure ratios corresponding regular reflection,Mach reflection and strong oblique wave in a planar Laval nozzle with aspect ratio 5 were 0.0841,0.0959 and 0.2005 respectively,and then the accuracy of these values were verified with numerical simulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it