MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2373181894

Effects of Simulated Acid Rain on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Oenothera speciosa

2015· article· en· W2373181894 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
XU Xiao-y

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to elevated CO2
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationSeedlingOenotheraBiologyHorticultureAcid rainShootVitalityBotanyAgronomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seeds of Oenothera speciosa were selected as experimental materials,effects of simulated acid rain on seed germination and seedling growth were studied by simulating acid rain solution with different p H values. Results showed that,seed germination and seedling growth of Oenothera speciosa were suffered different influences under acid rain stress. Only 5 percent of seeds germinated when p H values was 2. 5. Germination energy,germination rate and vitality index significantly dropped under acid rain stress with p H value from 2. 5to 3. 0,while it had no significant effect on germination energy and vitality index under other treatments,but the growth of roots of Oenothera speciosa seedlings was greatly inhibited under all of the p H values. Only when p H value was 2. 5,seedling shoot length and fresh weight significant decreased. So it had no significant effect on seed germination of Oenothera speciosa under p H value higher than 3. 5,but it was greatly inhibited under p H lower than 3. 0. and the growth of root was most sensitive to acid rain stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicPlant responses to elevated CO2French-language works237,207