MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2373199535

Sustainable development evaluation based on ecological footprint:a case study of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region

2013· article· en· W2373199535 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGanhanqu dili · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Resources and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcological footprintSustainable developmentEnvironmental resource managementEcological deficitCarrying capacityScale (ratio)Consumption (sociology)FootprintEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental economicsGeographyEcologyEconomicsCartography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The quantitative evaluation of sustainable development ability is a prerequisite for implementing the strategy of sustainable development,and it is also a key point to study the sustainable development.The ecological footprint model,a method developed by Canadian scholar Mathis Wackernagel,is used to measure sustainable development ability in this thesis.Based on the calculation of ecological footprint,the paper considers that the developmental ability index is one of the best indexes for evaluation.determined by calculating the land(ecological footprint)which needed by the human society who takes all consumption activities in a specific area,and the land(ecosystem carrying capacity)which can provide for biological and productive materials in the same area,we can compare the land(ecological footprint)to the land(ecosystem carrying capacity),so that it can help us to make a judgment for regional sustainable development.Adopting ecological footprint model,this thesis calculates an ecological footprint according to different land types and different consumption types in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region from 1991 to 2010.For the first time,it analyzes components of the Region's ecological deficit,modifies the Ulanowicz model,and introduces ecological defici(tand surplus)for each 10 000 Yuan of GDP when using the calculating formula innovatively.Finally,it evaluates the sustainable development ability of the eco-economic system for a long time scale in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region objectively.The thesis owns something referential value and practical significance such as increasing the diversity of ecological footprint,making the best use of resources,controlling the energy consumption by appropriate policies and promoting the sustainable economic development of Ningxia.The results obtained indicate that the ecological deficit per cap in Ningxia is higher than the deficit per capita of the world(which is 0.4 hm2)and nationwide(0.68 hm2)from 1991 to 2010.During this period the ecological deficit per cap in Ningxia increased five-fold and the stability of the eco-economic system decreased by a significant degree.However,it has shown a tendency to improve in recent years.In the year of 2010,the utilization ratios of resources claim the highest efficiency,and its sustainable development ability of the region contributed toward a continuous rise.In 2010,the sustainable development ability of the eco-economic system was 2.993,which was the highest in twenty years and more than 16 times 20 years ago.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it