Effect of combination therapy with massage and intraarticular injection of sodium hyaluronate on early primary knee osteoarthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To observe the effect of combination therapy with massage and intraarticular injection of sodium hyaluronate on early primary knee osteoarthritis.Methods:A total of 300 cases with early knee osteoarthritis were randomly divided into trial group and control group by half.Patients in trial group were treated by combination therapy with massage and intraarticular injection of sodium hyaluronate,while patients in control group were treated by intraarticular injection of sodium hyaluronate only.Short-from of McGill pain questionnaire(SF-MPQ) and HSS scale were performed before treatment,at the end of one month,3 months,5 months and 7 months after treatment.Results:After one month,3 months and 5 months,there were no significant differences in results of SF-MPQ and HSS scale,while at the end of 7 months,patients in trial group showed significant analgesia effect and improvement in function of knee joint(P0.05).Conclusions:During the early treatment,there are no difference in analgesia effect and HSS score.However,in the long term of treatment,combination therapy with massage and intraarticular injection of sodium hyaluronate is more effective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".