MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2373274308

Brief analysis of the development of Shanghai Power Grid secondary system as based upon the blackout fault in USA and Canada

2003· article· en· W2373274308 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueShanghai Electric Power · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlackoutRelayProtective relayGridElectric power systemElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsFault (geology)Power-system protectionUnificationPower gridPower (physics)Computer scienceGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based upon the cause analysis of the blackout fault of Aug, 14 in USA and Canada it was suggested that much importance should be paid to the construction of the Shanghai Grid secondary system. Technically the configuration and the coordination of the grid and power plant relay system should be strengthened, the upgrading of the old relay system should be speeded up, the management of the DC power source system should be consolidated and the configuration level of the relays of Shanghai Grid should be enhanced as soon as possible. In the field of management, the management of the software version, the internal logic of the micro-processor relay devices. the optical channel of the relay devices and the secondary circuit should also be strengthened, further consolidating technical supervision and realizing the technical unification of the relay profession of the grid and power plant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it