MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2373324224

Channel Analysis and Precaution of Interferences Exist in CAN-BUS

2007· article· en· W2373324224 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElevator Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSystem busKey (lock)Local busInterference (communication)Channel (broadcasting)SIGNAL (programming language)Transmission (telecommunications)Bus networkCAN busComputer networkProcess (computing)Node (physics)Address busControl busIEBusTelecommunicationsComputer hardwareComputer security
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper analyzes and describes the characteristic and signal channel of CAN-BUS,researches into the origin of interference problem,and advances many useful measures against interference which are testified in a bus system based on CAN-BUS,and explains how the data transmits on CAN-BUS with the process of light signal communication,then discusses the CAN-BUS key technical problems as the transmission speed,channel capacity,node capacity and so on,also discusses the key problems on development of CAN-BUS and expects the future trend of CAN-BUS according to the Chinese circumstances of research on the CAN-BUS in the end of this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it