MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2373724684

The Construction of Performance Auditing System of Public Investment

2008· article· en· W2373724684 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCai-mao yanjiu · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEvaluation and Optimization Models
Canadian institutionsPricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuditInvestment (military)GeneralityAccountabilityBusinessPerformance auditAccountingInstitutionGenerally Accepted Auditing StandardsPublic investmentIndustrial organizationEconomicsAccounting information systemInternal auditManagementEconomic policyPolitical scienceJoint audit
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There exist huge amounts of low efficient investments and superfluous construction in public investments in our country.Accountability-based performance auditing plays a non-fungible role in monitoring performance of public investments.The author discusses the background of system construction of public investment performance auditing,summarizes and induces the generality of Chinese and foreign performance auditing of public investments,analyzes the game relationship in system construction of performance auditing of public investment under a game model,and puts forward some suggestions for corresponding institution development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it