THE DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF MILITARY TRAINIG INJURY IN NAVAL SHIP TROOPS AND THE EFFECT OF INTERVENTION ON IT
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To investigate the incidence and distribution characteristics of special military training injury in naval ship troops and the effect of intervention on it.Methods:1 648 soldiers and officers from landing ship, submarine and detroyer were selected by cluster sampling for epidemiological prospective study. 491 of them were as intervention subjects, 172 as the corresponding period control and 985 as historical control.Results: The yearly cumulative incidece of military training injuies was 14.62%, and the peak incidence occurred in July, 46.53% of the injuries in the mechanical and electric department. The highest injury incidence(32.64%) was found in lower extremities, and acute trauma was the main type. The injury incidence in intervention group (8.96%) was significantly lower than that in corresponding period control(12.21%,P0.05) as well as historical control(14.62%,P0.01).Conclusion:The occurrence of injury in naval ship troops during special military training differed from other services and arms, and was significantly declined after intervention was taken.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it