MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2373927542 · doi:10.1142/s0219622016500267

A Hybrid Artificial Fish Swarm Simulated Annealing Optimization Algorithm for Automatic Identification of Clusters

2016· article· en· W2373927542 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Clustering Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsCrandall UniversityNational Research Council CanadaUniversité de Moncton
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCluster analysisComputer scienceSimulated annealingSwarm behaviourFuzzy logicFuzzy clusteringA priori and a posterioriRobustness (evolution)AlgorithmRate of convergenceData miningConvergence (economics)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces an alternative fuzzy clustering method that does not require fixing the number of clusters a priori and produce reliable clustering results. This newly proposed method empowers the existing Improved Artificial Fish Swarm algorithm (IAFSA) by the simulated annealing (SA) algorithm. The hybrid approach can prevent IAFSA from unexpected vibration and accelerate convergence rate in the late stage of evolution. Computer simulations are performed to compare this new method with well-known fuzzy clustering algorithms using several synthetic and real-life datasets. Our experimental results show that our newly proposed approach outperforms some other well-known existing fuzzy clustering algorithms in terms of both accuracy and robustness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it