Effects of Hydration-Dehydration Treatment on Germination and high-temperature Tolerance of Wild Ryegrass Seeds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Water absorption behaviours and germination performances of Elymus sibiricus and Elymus dahuricus seeds under different temperatures with hydration-dehydration treatments were probed.The results show:Germination percentage、germination speed and uniformity of Elymu sibiricus and Elymus dahuricus seeds are highest under 25 ℃.Highest germination percentage and germination speed are achieved with the hydration-dehydration treatments under 50% of imbibition for Elymu sibiricus seed.Highest germination percentage is achieved with 30% imbibiton and highest germination speed is achieved with 100% imbibition for Elymus dahuricus seed.Highest germination uniformities are achieved with untrerated seeds for both the two species.Hydration-dehydration treatments have profound effects on seed tolerance to high temperatures in terms of seed vigour level under 35 ℃ and 40-25 ℃germination conditions for both the two species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".