ENTRE CINEFORMAÇÃO DOCENTE E O CINEMA DE UM CORPO SENSÍVEL: o que os jovens esperam da escola e de nós professores?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This text is a composite of images and woven talks with a group of teachers from a school in the city of Vitória-ES, in a survey completed in 2015.It questions from conversations with teachers, through the intercession of the images movie (virtual) and school pictures (today), what young people expect from school and we professores.Toma as theoretical intercessors Deleuze (2007) and his perspective of the world as a metacinema, Corazza (2008) and the discussion of teaching.Methodologically, to mobilize the cartographic research (CARVALHO, 2008), using as a trigger conversations the film "Like Stars on Earth" and monitoring of the school routine.It concludes that the cineformação teachers denounce be surrounded by speeches that try to automate thinking to expect ready and obedient students.Their narratives pierce the clichés and allow sensitive images envisage, in the time stream, a makeup plan.Similarly, the people-young breaks the clichés you'd expect from the school, is not to be supposed as a people, predetermined, but part of the inventions of its constituent movements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".