MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2374059571

Analysis of Electromagnetic Transients Simulation Algorithm for Distribution Systems

2008· article· en· W2374059571 on OpenAlexaff
Liwei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Chinese Society of Universities for Electric Power System and its Automation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh-Voltage Power Transmission Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)SoftwareComputer scienceSimulation softwareTransmission systemFault (geology)Node (physics)Electromagnetic simulationDistribution (mathematics)Modeling and simulationState (computer science)Transmission (telecommunications)AlgorithmEngineeringElectronic engineeringSimulationMathematicsTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years,more and more attentions are paid to the modeling and simulation of distribution system with the distributed generation technology widely used in the world.Firstly,the development of the main software on electromagnetic transient simulation for transmission system is summarized in this paper.Then,some of them are utilized to implement the simulation of the IEEE 4-node test feeder.The simulation results obtained under normal and fault condition are compared and analyzed.The results coincide well with each other in steady state,but they are a little different during the action of switch.The differences are illustrated with the methods adopted in the program.The analysis supplies a basis for accurate research on the problems of distribution system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Chinese Society of Universities for Electric Power System and its AutomationSame topicHigh-Voltage Power Transmission SystemsFrench-language works237,207