MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2374148784

The Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors and Its Subunits:From Structure to Function

2004· article· en· W2374148784 on OpenAlexaff
Qiu Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Journal of Coll Biology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyAcetylcholine receptorNicotinic agonistCys-loop receptorsReceptorProtein subunitIon channelNicotinic acetylcholine receptorCell biologyAlpha-4 beta-2 nicotinic receptorTransmembrane domainBiophysicsNeuroscienceBiochemistryGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are legend-gated ion channels. Each receptor is composed of 5 subunits, and each subunit has 4 α-helix transmembrane domains. The channel pore is shaped by an inner ring of 5 α-helices of M2, which curve radially to create a tapering path in the middle of membrane, and an outer ring of 15 α-helices which coil around each other and shield the inner ring from the lipid. So far 17 subunits of the receptors have been determined, which belong to a big gene family with a same origin and are expressed in the central nervous system, peripheral nervous system and muscle tissue. There are so many subunits and specific expression in different tissues, which result in their many physiological and pharmacological features and functions. Recently genetically manipulated mice, such as gene knock-out mice, have greatly increased our understanding of the sub- unit composition and physiological properties of the receptors in vivo. In this article, we review the related researching progress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Journal of Coll BiologySame topicNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyFrench-language works237,207