MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2374158862

Determination of the Dissociation Constants of Eleostearic Acid and its Derivative by HPLC

2014· article· en· W2374158862 on OpenAlexaff
Xiangyang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Reagents · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCyclohexeneDissociation constantTricarboxylic acidDissociation (chemistry)High-performance liquid chromatographyAcid dissociation constantAqueous solutionChromatographyOrganic chemistryMedicinal chemistryCitric acid cycleCatalysisBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dissociation constants of eleostearic acid,3-nbutyl-6-( 1-decyl olefinic acid base) 4-cyclohexene diacid( C23 diacid methylester) and 3-n-butyl-6-( 1-decyl olefinic acid methyl ester) 4-cyclohexene diacid( C22 tricarboxylic acid) were determined by High Performance Liquid Chromatography( HPLC). Observed retention factors were determined using mobile phases with different percentages of organic modifier in the pH range from 2. 00 to 12. 00. A twostage least squares fitting procedure for fitting a general equation to the observed retention factors was used to calculate the dissociation constants at each percentage of organic modifier.The obtained dissociation constants were extrapolated to give pKa values in 100% aqueous solutions. The obtained pKavalues were of an extrapolated to be calculated by ACD procedure. The eleostearic acid has a pKaof 4. 79 and the C23 diacid methylester has a pKa1of 3. 81,a pKa2of 5. 78. The C22 tricarboxylic acid has a pKa1of 3. 68,a pKa2of 4. 77,a pKa3of 5. 73.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical ReagentsSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyFrench-language works237,207