The Images of Five Young Women Artists——A Feminist Reading of Five Children's Books
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the most discernable characteristics of modern English children's literature is that it was and is deeply influenced by feminist theories.A group of feminists represented by Monique Wittig stick to the idea that language plays a key role in building up women's subjectivity,and that it is language and the cultural power embedded in language that form the subjects as what they are.Lisa Paul,a Canadian feminist and children's literature critic, claims that both women's and children's literature has been subject to linguistic repression.In order to get their voice heard,feminist writers of children's books empower their female protagonists with superior language ability to express themselves while questing their subjectivity.This paper tends to prove the feminist influence upon children's literature through a study of five modern children's books which are all Bildungsroman:the Emily Trilogy by Lucy Montgomery,the prestigious Canadian writer of children's books,Harriet the Spy (1964) by Louise Fitzhugh and A Sound of Chariots (1972) by Mollie Hunter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".