MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2374371280

Wavelet Package Speech Enhancement Based on Mask Property Shrink

2010· article· en· W2374371280 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWaveletPESQMasking (illustration)Wavelet packet decompositionSpeech recognitionSecond-generation wavelet transformSpeech enhancementProperty (philosophy)Noise (video)Wavelet transformDiscrete wavelet transformArtificial intelligenceStationary wavelet transformPattern recognition (psychology)Noise reduction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the analysis of traditional wavelet speech denoise methods,a new wavelet denoie method is proposed,in which the ear masking property is used to design the shrink function.This method transforms the noisy speech into the wavelet spaces that reflect the ear hearing properties,then calculates the noise masking energies and adapts the factor in the shrink function,and then,the shrink function is used to process the noisy wavelet coefficients and,by inverse wavelet transforms,to gain the denoised speech.The experiments show that the better output NSR and PESQ of the enhanced speech could be gained by the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it