Relationship between distribution characteristics of grasshoppers and habitat in the Heihe River Basin
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By using field investigation and quantitative analysis,we studied the correlation between grasshopper composition,ecological species groups and habitat in different grassland of the middle and upper reaches of the river Heihe.Results indicated that terrain,climate condition,soil and vegetation composition have significant heterogeneity in middle and upper reaches of the river Heihe,a total of 38 grasshopper species belonging to 11 genera and 3 families were captured during continuous four years,32 more-area-distributed grasshopper species were classified as 8 ecological species groups when the correlation coefficient is 0.5.Grasshoppers have very widely ecological adaption,meanwhile grassland habitat determinate geographical distribution patterns of grasshoppers,grasshoppers in the researched region mainly distribute at the altitude range of 2000~3000 meters of Qilian Mountains.Temperature is the promoting factor to grasshopper species composition,while other factors are inhibitors;Temperature and precipitation are the promoting factors to grasshopper density.The correlation between extreme minimum temperature and grasshopper species composition is very significant(r=0.706,0.761,p0.01),and exists a significant correlation with grasshopper density(r=0.665,p0.05).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it