MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2374505944

Relations Between COD Removal and Biofilm Thickness and Density of Downflow Anaerobic Turbulent Bed

2001· article· en· W2374505944 on OpenAlexaff
Cheng He

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hohai University · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbulenceFluidizationBiogasAnaerobic exerciseChemistryRange (aeronautics)Fluidized bedHydraulic retention timeDraft tubeChemical engineeringMaterials sciencePulp and paper industryEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental scienceWastewaterWaste managementMechanicsComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A reactor,called a downflow anaerobic turbulent bed,is introduced,in which the circulation is forced by biogas to ensure fluidization of floating carrier particles.When the operational range of the reactor is 6 22?kg/(m 3·d) and the hydraulic retention time 0.25~0.94?d,the COD Cr removal efficiency remains 65%~85%,and the bio film thickness is rather small(5~30?μm),while the bio film density is high (70?g/L).Experimental results show that the biofilm thickness and density increase with the decrease of COD removal.Bioactivity kept at a high level in the reactor indicates that violent turbulence and shear are beneficial for the growth of microbe and the formation of a thin,dense and active film.Meanwhile,the volatile solid detachment at a high organic loading rate (OLR) increases quasi linearly with COD removal and with the decrease of the amount of solid in the reactor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hohai UniversitySame topicWater Quality Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207