MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2374546470

Urban Estuary:A Successful Application of Landscape Urbanism in Toronto's Lower Don Lands

2010· article· en· W2374546470 on OpenAlex
Yang Ru

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueXiandai chengshi yanjiu · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLandscape and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrbanismDowntownPort (circuit theory)Landscape architectureGeographyAgency (philosophy)Landscape urbanismUrban planningEnvironmental planningCivil engineeringRegional scienceSociologyArchitectureEngineeringArchaeologySocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Toronto's Lower Don Land is located in the intersection between Toronto Waterfront and mouth of Don River,a former port just east of downtown.With the rapid development of Toronto,more and more new immigrants are trying to move in;this area is facing an unpredictable pressure of future development.How to utilize the theory of landscape urbanism to resolve the conflict between abandoned and development has been a great challenge for Toronto Waterfront Conservation Agency(TWCA).This paper is focusing on explaining the application of landscape urbanism on fast growing situations.Via the introduction and analysis of the winning proposalUrban Estuaryin Low Don Lands Design Competition in 2007,the author aims to find out useful lessons that Chinese cities could learn from the western experiences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it