The Source and Development of Phenomenological Pedagogy:From Ultrecht to Alberta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the 19th century,the increasing crisis of European science and humanity made people get far away from the life world and the lived experience in the craze of pursuing scientific knowledge.Dilthey,the leader of the first generation in Cultural Education fought against this trend of scientism with life philosophy.As a school of thoughts,phenomenological pedagogy came into being at the university of Ultrecht in the Netherlands.Langeveld,the most important figure,belonged to the third generation of Cultural Education in Germany.Ultrecht school explored the phenomena of educational life,making use of the philosophy of phenomenology and its methods,including Husserl,Hedegger and Merleau-Ponty.Max van Manen at the university of Alberta,Canada made new contributions to the development and transcendence of phenomenological pedagogy.In terms of the construction of epistemology of practice and research on human science methodology,Alberta is far beyond Ultrecht.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".