MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2374679699

The Use of Robots in Hydrography

2015· article· en· W2374679699 on OpenAlexaffabout
Adam J. Kerr, D. F. Dinn

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Hydrographic Review · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsCanadian Hydrographic Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobotCover (algebra)Hazardous wasteEngineeringHydrographyConjunction (astronomy)Systems engineeringField (mathematics)Submarine pipelineComputer scienceAeronauticsTransport engineeringGeographyArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineeringCartography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Robots are increasingly being applied to tasks which are hazardous or which they can carry out more effectively or safely than people. The use of remotely controlled submersibles for conducting precise undersea surveys has been proposed recently in conjunction with oil industry activities. In Canada robot vehicles are currently under development for offshore surveys of areas under permanent ice cover. This paper describes two requirements, the different technology that is involved in each system, and the progress to date on the developments which, in the case of one system, have now advanced to successful field trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.199

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Hydrographic ReviewSame topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207