MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2374797313

Isolation and identification of endophytic bacterium TG116 from Typhonium giganteum and its antimicrobial characteristics

2014· article· en· W2374797313 on OpenAlexaff
Ling Li-ju

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Northwest Normal University · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Genetic and Mutation Studies
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPhytophthora capsiciAntimicrobialStrain (injury)MicrobiologyBacillus licheniformisMyceliumBacteriaBacillus subtilisBacillus (shape)BotanyPhytophthoraGenetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study is focused on the endophytic bacterium strain TG116 isolated from the tuber of Typhonium giganteum Engl.Morphological,physiological and biochemical characteristics of TG116 are identified using 16 SrRNA sequence analysis.Antimicrobial characteristics of TG116 are studied using surface spread plate experiment,confront antibiotic culture experiment and differed antagonism procedure.The growth curve,optimum temperature,optimum pH value and salt tolerance of strain TG116 are systematically studied in this paper at the same time.Results show that strain TG116 display a wide range of antifungal spectrum which exhibite antibiotic activities toward all the 7 tested phytopathogens including Phytophthora capsici.The strain can cause the mycelia of fungi into distortion and deformation.According to its morphological,physiological and biochemical characteristics and 16 S rRNA sequence analysis,the strain is preliminarily identified as Bacillus licheniformis.This study can supply new strain resource for the biological control of crop disease and can also provide evidence for exploring and utilizing antimicrobial endophytic bacteria in Typhonium giganteum Engl.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Northwest Normal UniversitySame topicPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesFrench-language works237,207