MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2374886322

On WTO Members’ Right to Restrict Exportation of Natural Resources Products:Analysis on China-Exportation of Various Raw Materials

2010· article· en· W2374886322 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaolin Li

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Trade Organization Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExportationAccessionChinaInternational tradeBusinessNatural resourceRaw materialResource (disambiguation)SovereigntyPolitical scienceLawPoliticsEuropean union
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The US, EC and Mexico challenged export measures of raw materials against China in WTO in 2009, of which the decisive legal point is GATT Article XX (g) taking account of China’s extensive com- mitments upon accession to WTO. Legal analysis demonstrates that China could win on GATT XX (g). In the current WTO framework, there is neither rule basis nor Members’ consensus to claim trade liberaliza- tion in natural resource products. Based on sovereign rights over territorial natural resource, China should not, and also unnecessarily, lift restrictions on exportation of natural resources products even if we lose this case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicWorld Trade Organization LawFrench-language works237,207