MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ARTIFICIAL IMMUNE NETWORK-BASED MULTI-ROBOT FORMATION PATH PLANNING WITH OBSTACLE AVOIDANCE

2016· article· en· W2374900773 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robotics and Automation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersShandong University
KeywordsObstacle avoidanceMotion planningObstacleComputer sciencePath (computing)RobotArtificial intelligenceMobile robotComputer networkGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial immune network algorithm (AINA) combined with position tracking control method is used for multi-robot formation path planning. The proposed algorithm avoids obstacles and recovers formation for follower robot after passing around obstacles. Different methods are adopted to calculate the steering direction and the linear velocity of the follower robot. Steering direction of the follower robot is computed with AINA. AINA has abilities of selfrecognition and diversity, and solves the problems of local minima and immature convergence. The optimal steering direction selected with AINA quickly tends towards the steering direction of leader robot, and successfully avoids obstacles. The linear velocity of follower robot is computed with position tracking control method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it