MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2374959083

A Study on the Law Issue of " Canadian Power Safeguard Measures" in the WTO Frame

2013· article· en· W2374959083 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Taiyuan University of Technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEnergy and Environmental Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSafeguardRenewable energySubsidyEnergy lawEnforcementBusinessGovernment (linguistics)Environmental economicsPopularityLaw enforcementFrame (networking)Law and economicsIndustrial organizationInternational tradeEconomicsLawEnvironmental lawEngineeringPolitical scienceMarket economyTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to its recycleable and environment-friendly features,renewable energy is gaining popularity all over the world.However,the defects of the renewable energy such as the high cost have affected its own development.Therefore,many countries have put forward their own preferential policies concerning the development of renewable energy,whose enforcement has brought quite a few issues to the WTO.Take Ds412 as an example.The SCM Agreement can't decide wheather the government 's subsidies in the field of renewable energy are the ones in the legal sense.Hence it has no binding force to the governments' support behavior,which,to some extent,is against the original objectives of the SCM Agreement.In the future the problem may be solved by Initiating the Article 8 of the SCM Agreement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it