MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2375139105

Exploration and Prospects on Development Trends of “People First” and “Entertainment” of Chinese Gymnastics-In Changzhou Canadian Inspire Sports Gymnastics Club as Case

2014· article· en· W2375139105 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
LU Zhiha

Bibliographic record

VenueShoudu Tiyu Xueyuan xuebao · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSport and Mega-Event Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClubPromotion (chess)EntertainmentChinaPopularityAdvertisingPopulationPublic relationsReputationPolitical scienceEconomic growthBusinessMarketingEngineeringSociologySocial scienceMedicineEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the process of National Fitness wave and socio-economic development,most of Chinese sports items play their due role in the mass sports and building a harmonious society,and their market-oriented and industrial development have yet entered high-speed development stages.But as advantage events in the world competitions,gymnastics is currently facing with bad situations which workout population is lack,mass base is weak,fitness effect is not satisfactory.As Canada's national famous gymnastics club,Inspire Sports Gymnastics Club has accumulated rich experience and reputation in their domestic market management and education,it enters the Chinese market,combining with China's national situations,excavating the secrets and exploring the key points of gymnastics giving interest and funny to the people.And it is committed to the popularity and promotion of gymnastics in China,complying with the future market development and the trend of gymnastics development and promotion.As an example,we explore and research the way of Chinese gymnastics People First and entertainment development,which will have important reference value to the Chinese gymnastics market-oriented development,expanding population gymnastics,mining and exploring the gymnastics' roles to mass sports fitness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueShoudu Tiyu Xueyuan xuebaoSame topicSport and Mega-Event ImpactsFrench-language works237,207