MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2375301095

Studies on Blood Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of Ceftiofur in Ducks

2010· article· en· W2375301095 on OpenAlexaff
Mingchun Liu, Yang Jiao, Lijie Lijie, Song FuJie, Ding FengBo

Bibliographic record

VenueShenyang Nongye Daxue xuebao · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacokineticsBioavailabilityCeftiofurCmaxChemistryPharmacologyAbsorption (acoustics)Oral administrationHigh-performance liquid chromatographyChromatographyMedicineCephalosporinAntibioticsBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concentration of desfuroyiceftiofur(DFC) which is the metabolites of ceftiofur was detected with high performance liquid chromatogram(HPLC),and the pharmacokinetics parameters were analyzed with 3P97.The pharmacokinetic characteristics of ceftiofur after intravenous injection were best described by a one-compartment open model,the main pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: t1/2 2.28 h,Co 27.29 μg·mL-1,ke 0.30 h-1,Vc 0.07 L·kg-1 and AUC 100.07 mg·L-1·h-1.After oral administration,the plasma concentration-time data was fitted to a two-compartment open model,and the main pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: t1/2ɑ 1.64 h,t1/2β 26.85 h,tmax 1.09 h,Cmax 9.08 μg·mL-1,AUC 89.60 mg·L-1·h-1 and the bioavailability 89.54%.The pharmacokinetic characteristics of ceftiofur following intramuscular injection were best described by a two-compartment open model,and the main pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: t1/2ɑ 2.28 h,t1/2β 14.84 h,tmax 0.28 h,Cmax 15.23 μg·mL-1,AUC 99.32 mg·L-1.h-1 and the bioavailability 99.25%.These results showed that after intramuscular injection and oral administration in ducks,ceftiofur had rapid absorption,extensive distribution,long half-time and high bioavailability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueShenyang Nongye Daxue xuebaoSame topicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentFrench-language works237,207