MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2375339524

Identification and Control of the Endogenous Microbe in Anti-Antibiotic Screening of Transgenic Brassica napus Seeds

2009· article· en· W2375339524 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huang Fu-cai

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant tissue culture and regeneration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrassicaKanamycinBiologyGenetically modified cropsAgrobacteriumTransgeneEndogenyArabidopsisBacteriaAntibioticsMicrobiologyBotanyGeneBiotechnologyBiochemistryGeneticsMutant
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arabidopsis Auxin Response Factor 8(AtARF 8) gene can weaken the apical dominance and improve side sprouts growing when it is overexpressed.The flore-dip transformation method was used to transfer AtARF 8 gene into rape(Brassica napus L.) flowers and 8 143 candidate seeds were harvested from transformed plants.During screening for the transgenic plant,however,250 mg/L kanamycin was not able to effectively control contamination of endogenous microbe from seeds.Through cytological identification and PCR technique,endogenous microbe were determined to be agrobacterium LBA 4404.Different antibacterial substances such as gentamicin sulphate and ceftriaxone sodium were employed to eliminate contamination resulted from the endogenous bacteria.It was found that 50 mg/L ceftriaxone sodium could not only control the contamination but also had little effects on the growth and development of the plant.So 50 mg/L ceftriaxone sodium can be used as the appropriate antibiotic in anti-antibiotic screening of transgenic Brassica napus seeds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeed→Same topicPlant tissue culture and regeneration→French-language works237,207→