MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2375436538

Statistics and analysis of China's sulphur market in 2010

2011· article· en· W2375436538 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSulphuric acid and industry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCivil and Geotechnical Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenminbiChinaAgricultural economicsPhosphate fertilizerTariffFertilizerEconomicsAgricultural scienceGeographyEnvironmental scienceInternational tradeChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Statistics of China's sulphur import and analysis of domestic market in 2010 are carried out.China imported sulphur 10 489.8 kt in 2010,a decrease of 13.79%compared to 2009.Sulphur price reached its first peak in mid-March at about 1 600 RMB/t in East China market,and then began to fall due to decreased fertilizer demand and phosphate fertilizer price,in mid-July down to about 800 RMB/t,the lowest level in this year.So low price attracted a number of speculators entering market for building inventories,which brought about the second price peak of sulphur in around November at 1 580~1 600 RMB/t.At the end of the year,because of the adjusting of national phosphate fertilizer tariff,sulphur market fell into the downturn again.In 2010,the main sulphur suppliers for China were Saudi Arabia,Canada and Kazakhstan and China's sulphur purchase concentrated in the provinces of Jiangsu,Yunnan,Guizhou,Shandong,Hubei,el at.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it