MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2375549421

The Applications of Carbon Nanotubes in Electrical and Optical Nanobiosensor

2011· article· en· W2375549421 on OpenAlexaff
Yin Wei-feng

Bibliographic record

VenueImaging Science and Photochemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrochemical sensors and biosensors
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbon nanotubeBiomoleculeBiosensorNanotechnologyMaterials scienceElectron transferRaman spectroscopyCovalent bondAdsorptionElectrochemistryCarbon nanobudOptical properties of carbon nanotubesElectrodeChemistryNanotubePhotochemistryOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon nanotubes(CNTs) have attracted great attention in many fields due to their unique physical and electrochemical properties,such as large specific surface area,strong electron transfer capability,good adsorption performance,etc.Immobilization of enzymes,proteins,DNA and other biomacromolecules to the surface of carbon nanotubes can be achieved through covalent and non-covalent interactions,including physical absorption,electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions,which facilitates a direct,fast electron transfer from biomolecules to electrode and can be applied in electrochemical biosensors.On the other hand,carbon nanotubes have recently been applied in the design of optical biosensors.Multiple spectral estimation can be employed to quantitative analysis of the biological molecules,through mesurement of the characteritical Raman spectra and fluorescence emission of CNTs in near IR region.In this paper,the application of carbon nanotubes in the fields of electrical and optical biosensors are reviewed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImaging Science and PhotochemistrySame topicElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsFrench-language works237,207