MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2375571668

A zone-control algorithm with unequal limits in the model predictive control

2005· article· en· W2375571668 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJisuanji yu yingyong huaxue · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStability (learning theory)Object (grammar)Computer scienceContradictionControl (management)AlgorithmVariable (mathematics)Point (geometry)Model predictive controlBase (topology)Coupling (piping)Control variableControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsMachine learningEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As to the plant with multi-variable and coupling performance, control stability is paramount. Up to this point, it is necessary to diminish and weaken the regulating. However, it should take hard regulating to quickly withdraw the output into the object, as the output goes away the object, especially run to the dangerous direction. Therefore, how to solve the contradiction between speediness and stability is presented. To solve the problem, the paper will propose zone-control algorithm with unequal limits on the base of the theory of MPC, which take various control to different devious from the object through distinguishing the devious directions by different weights. In this way, it realizes stability as possible as under the prediction of quickly returning the object. In addition, the solution to the algorithm paper is discussed and finally it is proved that the new algorithm is realizable by the simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it