Influence of different nursing intervention on diabetic patients with mild cognitive impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To explore the application effect on nursing intervention to different methods of diabetes patients with mild cognitive impairment.Methods 62 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with mild cognitive impairment were divided into observation group and control group,each group had 31 cases.Control group was given conventional nursing intervention,the observation group was given conventional nursing intervention and cognitive function nursing intervention,MoCA,MMSE and ADL rating scale,detection fasting blood glucose,postprandial 2 h blood glucose,glycosylated hemoglobin of patients of two groups after 1 month of intervention were compared.Results The improve degree of MoCA,MMSE and ADL in observation group were better than that of control group(P 0.01),and the improvement of the blood sugar each indexes were superior to the control group(P 0.05,P 0.01).Conclusion Conventional nursing intervention is used in the diabetes patients with mild cognitive impairment on the basis of the implementation of the cognitive function nursing intervention can significantly improve their cognitive functions and daily life ability,which is helpful to the control of blood sugar,suitable for clinical promotion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".