MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2375760774

Design and Simulation of Three-Dimensional Terminal Guidance Law

2009· article· en· W2375760774 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGuidance and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMissileTerminal guidanceRobustness (evolution)Terminal (telecommunication)KinematicsLawPartial differential equationControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceEngineeringMathematicsControl (management)PhysicsAerospace engineeringArtificial intelligencePolitical scienceMathematical analysisClassical mechanics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three - dimensional terminal guidance law based on mixed H_2/H_∞control is designed in this tractate. During the process of design,missile - target three - dimensional relative kinematic equation for a missile guidance problem in homing phase is presented,and with dissipative theory,a computing method of mixed H_2/H_∞criteria is introduced.Based on the criteria,the mixed H_2/H_∞control leads to two coupled Hamilton - Jacobi partial differential inequality(HJPDI),and the H_2/H_∞guidance law is expressed by solving the HJPDI.The result of simulation shows that without information of target acceleration,the missile can also head off target rapidly,it means that the H_2/H_∞guidance law has strong robustness and better quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGuidance and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207