MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2375900198

Analysis on the Determination of the Domestic Price of a Selected Surrogate Country in the U.S Anti-dumping Investigation Involved the Imported Products from China——Comment on the Case:U. S. Court of International Trade Sustained Remand Result in the Ant

2010· article· en· W2375900198 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
L Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDumpingPetitionerChinaValuation (finance)LawRemand (court procedure)EconomicsFederal courtActuarial sciencePolitical scienceInternational tradeFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bristol Metals L.P. and other petitioners challenged Commerce's surrogate valuation of Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe(CCWASPP) from China and the assignment of individual rate to a Chinese company in its remand result. The U. S. Court of International Trade sustained U.S Department of Commerce's remand results for that they are supported by substantial evidence,and otherwise in accordance with law. This article briefly introduced the facts of the case,analyzed the reasoning of the Court's decision,then comment on some legal issues of this case,especially on the determination of the domestic price of a selected surrogate country in the U.S anti-dumping law and practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0090.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business Research→Same topicGlobal trade and economics→French-language works237,207→