Effect of photoperiod on digestibility and assmilation rate in the Chinese white-bellied rat (Niviverter confucianus)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Digested energy, metabolizable energy, digestibility and assimilation rate were quantified at different photoperiods in Niviventer confucianus using the food balance method. Three photoperiods were applied: a short photoperiod (8L∶16D), normal photoperiod(12L∶12D) and a long photoperiod(16L∶8D). The results show that digestibility and assimilation rate were highest in the short photoperiod with values of 83 97%±1 16% and 80 46%±1 34%, and lowest in the normal photoperiod with values of 81 74%±1 76% and 78 45%±1 41%. Moreover, the energy intake, digestibility and assimilated energy of N. confucianus decreased with the amount of daylight. The statistical significance of the results obtained by a one-factor analysis of variance were all less than 0 01 or 0 05 except for digested energy. This indicates that photoperiod is an important environmental factor to affect the energy metabolism of Niviventer confucianus .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".