Relation of suicide ideation to shame,alexithymia and perceived social support in college students from Gansu Province
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To explore the relation of suicide ideation to shame,alexithymia and perceived social support in college students of Gansu Province.Methods:Totally 898 grade two and grade three college students(459 males,439 females) from 8 colleges in Gansu Province were surveyed with the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation-Chinese Version(BSI-CV) for suicide ideation,the Experience of Shame Scale(ESS) for shame sense,twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale(TAS-20) for alexithymia,Perceived Social Support Scale(PSSS) for social support.Results:The rate of suicidal ideation among these students was 21.94%(197/898).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that personality factor of shame[OR = 1.08,95%CI:1.05- 1.11]and family support of perceived social support[OR = 0.93,95%CI:0.90- 0.96]were independently associated with suicidal ideation.Conclusion:It suggests that the suicide ideation may be related to shame sense,alexithymia,and social support in college students from Gansu Province,which should be considered to put into the intervention system for college students' suicide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".