MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2376513569 · doi:10.2310/6650.2005.00005.391

392 QUALITY OF LIFE AND BURDEN OF DISEASE FOR ADULTS WITH CONGENITAL HEART DISORDERS AND ARRHYTHMIAS

2005· article· en· W2376513569 on OpenAlexaff
Karen Kirkham, Danielle Thordarson, Doreen Fofonoff, M. Kiess, Shubhayan Sanatani

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Investigative Medicine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Life expectancyHeart diseasePediatricsPopulationNauseaComplicationCardiac arrhythmiaIntensive care medicinePhysical therapyInternal medicineAtrial fibrillationEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Advances in surgical techniques and patient care have decreased mortality rates and increased the life expectancy for patients with serious congenital heart abnormalities. These individuals are now commonly living into adulthood following palliative surgeries. As the group of adult congenital heart patients grows, it is increasingly important to quantify the experiences and symptoms that they live with. In order to understand the patient perspective, investigations must explore the impact that increased life expectancy has on the quality of life (QOL) of these individuals. Limited investigations have begun to describe QOL for this population but the impact of specific procedures and complications has not been well described. One frequent complication of palliative surgeries like the Fontan and Mustard procedures is arrhythmia and this investigation explores the impact of this complication on QOL and self-perceived health for these individuals. <h3>Methods</h3> Self-perceived health status and quality of life were investigated for 39 patients who had undergone either Fontan or Mustard procedures, and are followed in an adult congenital heart clinic. Patients completed a package that included the Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index (QLI) and the Short Form Health Status (SF-36) questionnaires, with additional items designed by the investigators to assess arrhythmia specific symptoms. <h3>Results</h3> No significant differences between the diagnostic groups (Mustard and Fontan) or arrhythmia (arrhythmia and nonarrhythmia) groups were found on measures of perceived health (SF-36), quality of life (QLI), or arrhythmia symptoms (dizziness, nausea, and syncope (all p ≥ .05)). Between-groups effect sizes (Cohen9s d) for Mustard vs. Fontan and arrhythmia vs. nonarrhythmia were small, indicating that surgical procedure or presence of diagnosed arrhythmia have little effect on patient9s perceived quality of life and perceived arrhythmia symptoms. <h3>Conclusion</h3> While arrhythmia is a common outcome of some corrective cardiac surgeries for congenital abnormalities, this study indicates that in the adult population, it has little impact on patients9 perceived quality of life. These results suggest that current efforts to manage adult congenital heart patients with arrhythmias have been successful at minimizing the impact of their conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Investigative MedicineSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207