The Research of the Patients with Vascular Cognitive Impairment no Dementia in Terms of Neuropsychology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective This paper is to investigate the characteristics of the patients with Vascular Cognitive Impairment of None dementia(VCIND) in terms of neuropsychology.Methods 42 patients with VCIND and 38 normal controls were examined with the neuropsychological test,including:mini-mental state examination(MMSE),activities of daily living scale(ADL),Preffer outpatient disability questinnair(POD),clock drawing test(CDT)and clinical dementia rating scale(CDR),Hachinski ischaemic scale(HIS),and center for epidemiological studiesdepression scale(CES-D).Results The scores of MMSE,CDT in the VCIND group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P0.05);the scores in the VCIND group,as far as place orientation,time orientation,attention calculation,verbal recognition memory,writing ability and structure ability were concerned,were significantly lower than those in the normal control group(P0.05).Conclusions The combination of CDT and MMSE can be used for early screening of cognitive impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".