MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2376801506

A dynamic optimization control approach of life cycle energy saving for heat exchanger network with bypasses

2013· article· en· W2376801506 on OpenAlexaff
Sun Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueHuagong xuebao · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat exchangerControl theory (sociology)EngineeringComputer scienceMathematical optimizationProcess engineeringControl (management)Mechanical engineeringMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to achieve sustainable energy saving of heat exchanger network in the life cycle,bypasses were set in the network to increase its control degree of freedom,while a certain margin was designed to provide operating space of optimal control.To better use bypass adjustment and margin of operating space,an optimal control approach method based on dynamic model of heat exchanger network was presented and combined with existing conventional control loop,not only expanding the feasible region of optimal control,but also meeting the accuracy requirements of the original conventional control loop.The cumulative cost minimization of heat exchanger network within a certain period was considered as the objective function,while considering the impact of disturbances on heat exchanger network.To meet the process conditions,the best bypass opening in the life cycle was solved in order to achieve sustained energy saving of heat exchanger network.Closed-loop correction,iterative and rolling implementation were adopted,and optimization was based on actual conditions.A global sub-optimal solution could only be arrived at every turn.However,the actual control result could achieve the optimum.Finally,a refinery's crude oil heat exchanger network was treated as the specific study object,illustrating the effectiveness and application prospect of the presented method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuagong xuebaoSame topicHeat Transfer and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207