Effect of Different Storage Methods on Seeds Germination of Idesia polycarpa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using Idesia polycarpa seeds as materials,Germination capability of seeds were studied after they stored in different storage methods. The results showed that low water content( 5. 40%) was beneficial to Idesia polycarpa seeds storage,but too-low water content( lower than 3. 58%) could impair the germination capability of seeds. Idesia polycarpa seeds wrapped with plastic bags,which were stored under 4 ℃,could keep better germination capability than under natural condition. Wet sand storage under 4 ℃ was the most suitable way to store Idesia polycarpa seeds among 6 storage methods,because it could not only maintain the germination capability of seeds but also may promote it. Using dryer to store Idesia polycarpa seeds under natural condition was the worst way and it could damage the germination capability of seeds. However,packing material( plastic bag and paper bag) used in storage made no influence on storage of Idesia polycarpa seeds. Moreover,whether Idesia polycarpa seeds were stored inside fruit or outside fruit,there would be a same result.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".