MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2376826790

Neutrino Paradox's Solution and its Support for Hawking's Positivism

2010· article· en· W2376826790 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
LI Qing-yan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Jishou University · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiofield Effects and Biophysics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutrinoPhysicsSolar neutrinoNeutrino oscillationRest (music)PositivismSolar neutrino problemStandard solar modelParticle physicsTheoretical physicsStandard Model (mathematical formulation)AstrophysicsPhilosophyEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the late 1960s,U.S.astrophysicist Davis successfully detected the solar neutrino.However,the number of income was only about half of the standard solar model predictions.According to unified electro-weak theory,the neutrino has zero rest mass,which constitutes a paradox of solar neutrinos.Kam-Lan Experimental results showed that atmospheric neutrino oscillation did occur,and neutrinos did have rest mass.The follow-up sudbury experiments finally resolved the issue of neutrino paradox,making people question unified electro-weak theory,think about their significance in particle physics as well as in astrophysics.Those objectively support the self-consistent logical positivism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Jishou UniversitySame topicBiofield Effects and BiophysicsFrench-language works237,207