MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2376856208

Analysis on Temporal-spatial Evolution Characteristics and Affecting Factors of Tourism Economic Disparity in Jilin Province

2015· article· en· W2376856208 on OpenAlexaff
Yang You-ba

Bibliographic record

VenueResource Development & Market · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional Economic and Spatial Analysis
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismEconomic geographyConvergence (economics)EndowmentGeographyEconomicsDivergence (linguistics)Polarization (electrochemistry)EconomyEconomic growthPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper applied the research methods which were used in regional economics to analyze the disparity in spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of the tourism economy in 2003-2012.The results showed that while the absolute disparity of tourism economy constantly expanded,relative disparity tended to be stable,the level of spatial polarization of tourism economy becoming weak,the disparity between and within regions were all falling,the disparity within regions was the main source to overall disparity,the changes of spatial pattern of convergence and divergence were not obvious.The endowment of tourist resources,the conditions of economic location,the level of economic development and the environmental policy were used to explain the causes of disparity in the tourism economy.Lastly,this paper intended to suggest ways to make tourism economic development a coordinated activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResource Development & MarketSame topicRegional Economic and Spatial AnalysisFrench-language works237,207