Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To explore alexithymia and the psychological health status in the parents of the teenage patients with obsession.Methods TAS,and SCL-90 were employed to the parents(researched group,n=102) of the 13～19 years old patients with obsession and the parents(controled grop,n=89) of the teenage with psychology health.Results The total TAS scale and Ⅰ～Ⅳ scale in the researched group were marked higher than that in the controled group(P0.01).The somatization,obsessive-compulsive,depression,anxiety,crankiness and psychopath of subscores of SCL-90 were much significantly higher than that in the control group(P0.01).Fifty-nine cases(57.84%) had some psychological problems.The total scale of TAS had positive correlation with the subscores of somatization,obsessive-compulsive,anxiety and psychopath of SCL-90,negative correlation with crankiness.Conclusion The parents of the patients with obsession have some problems in alexithymia and psychological health status.It is usually necessary to help the parents psychologically of the patients with obsession.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".