MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2377206505

Endosperm Callus Induction and Triploid Plant Regeneration of Morinda officinalis How.

2015· article· en· W2377206505 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMorinda citrifolia extract uses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndospermCallusGermplasmBiologyBotanyOfficinalisRegeneration (biology)In vitroPloidyMorindaMurashige and Skoog mediumTissue cultureHorticultureTraditional medicineCell biologyBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To establish the effective method by in vitro culture endosperms to obtain the triploid plant of Morinda officinalis How. Methods: The effects of plant growth regulators on inducing endosperm callus and plant regeneration of Morinda officinalis How. were studied. Results: The optional inducing callus mediums was MS + 2,4-D 2. 0 mg / L + 6-BA 1. 0 mg / L,the callus induced rate was 58. 9%; the bud differentiation medium was MS + 6-BA 1. 0- 2. 0 mg / L + IBA 0. 1- 0. 5 mg / L,the root medium was 1 /2 MS + IBA 0. 5mg / L,the root rate was 100%. The chromosome number of regenerated plant root tip cells was 2 n = 3 x = 33,a triploid plant. Conclusion: Culturing endosperms in vitro is an effective method to create new triploid germplasm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it