MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2377417794

Correlation between Cognition and Anxiety in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome

2012· article· en· W2377417794 on OpenAlex
Xuping Xiao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZhongguo quanke yixue · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePolysomnogramMontreal Cognitive AssessmentAnxietyHypopneaObstructive sleep apneaCognitionInternal medicineCorrelationAnxiety scorePhysical therapyApneaCognitive impairmentPolysomnographyPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To explore the correlation between cognition and anxiety in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome(OSAHS). Methods A total of 152 patients with OSAHS confirmed by an all-night(7 h)polysomnogram(PSG) were evaluated by Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA) and Zung self-rating anxiety scale(SAS). Results The total mean score of MoCA for the patients with OSAHS was(24.63±2.568).About 74.3%(113) of the patients obtained total score of of MoCA26.The average SAS score was(47.50±9.573).About 42.1%(64) of the patients obtained SAS score50.There were close correlations between MoCA score and SAS score(r=-0.343,P=0.000). Conclusion Most of the OSAHS patients exhibit cognitive impairment,and some of them have anxiety symptoms.The cognitive function and anxiety are closely correlated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it