MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2377636240

The combined effects of acute first ever lacunar infarction and cerebral white matter lesions on cognitive function impairment

2010· article· en· W2377636240 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lian Li-fe

Bibliographic record

VenueZhongguo naoxueguanbing zazhi · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHyperintensityCognitionLeukoaraiosisMontreal Cognitive AssessmentWhite matterCardiologyCognitive impairmentLacunar infarctionCerebral infarctionLacunar strokeFluid-attenuated inversion recoveryAudiologyInternal medicineMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyPsychiatryIschemic strokeIschemia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To investigate the association between the cognitive function impairment and patients with both acute first ever lacunar infarction and cerebral white matter lesions.Methods According to MRI T2 weighted-imaging and FLAIR imaging,137 patients were classified into 3 groups:(lacunar infarction,LI),(white matter lesions,WML),LI and WML.Thirty normal persons were regarded as control group.Cognitive performance was assessed with Montreal Cognitive Assessment at presentation.Results Compared with control subject,group with WML had significantly low scores in memory and language;group with LI had significantly low scores in calculation,language and executive function;group with both LI and WML had significantly low scores in memory,visual spatial and executive function(P0.01).The patients in group with both LI and WML performed poorer in the executive function(P0.01).Conclusions Patients with both LI and WML undergo cognitive fuction impairment,especially in memory,visual spatial and executive function.MoCA have a great advantage of assessing cognitive impairment caused by subcortical ischemic vascular disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhongguo naoxueguanbing zazhiSame topicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207